ATOS is not fit for purpose

[BoroBot]

ATOS do not carry out their tests correctly.
My cousin was passed fit to work a couple of months ago.
On Friday she died from her medical conditions and the stress she was under with an appeal.
She was aged only 39 and leaves a son in foster care.
RIP dear Helen, they can't hurt you any more.
- Alison, a grief stricken family, 14/5/2012

ATOS is not fit for purpose.
In media outlets there have been many cases where people with cancer, other terminal illnesses have been passed fit for work
but have died a couple of weeks later.
ATOS is a French company truly diabolically led and run and it is far below the level competence
of what a company dealing with complex health issues should be about.
When they send sick and dying people for work, ignore consultants advice
it is time to bring back good order to this system of health screening with proper doctors involved in the interviews
rather than a data entry clerk who taps into a computer.
We all know that the computer says NO.
- Big Vern, Not in London, 14/5/2012 08:44

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1upUfLZ4x

[BoroBot]

I find it hard to comprehend the statement by this loathsome baldy buffoon that "people will now have to be assessed by medical experts".
Since when did medical experts work on behalf of French owned ATOS, an organisation mired in accusations of fraudulent practices?.
Is it not a matter of fact that some of these "so called experts"
were previously stacking shelves in the local supermarkets?
How can it be that a person blind from the year 2000 was awarded zero points
and therefore failed the test with the assertion that his "condition" might improve over time?
What kind of a reckless quack can get away with this sort of diagnosis?

- DESSIPUERA, LansleyHammondMitchell&Grayling c/o Greedisgood.Allinittogether.co.uk Cayman , 14/5/2012 8:56

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1upXXbkBB