As the election looms, I'm not so sure...
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 6:52 pm
MJ Carr v Ray Mallon. The Labour candidate, versus 'Labours' Candidate. With all the clart flying around concerning Mallon (and I'm sure that regulars on the EG forum will recall that I've been quite critical of Mallon in the past) I'm not so sure that I want to vote for him. If you believe the critics and condemners, he is 'Labour' in all but name.
Meanwhile, MJ Carr, the 'Labour' candidate who we are told, wouldn't toe the party line. So, conversely, he's Labour in name only. I've read his latest election flyer and I agree with much of what he says. My only gripe is with him saying 'Vote MJ Carr for Change'. How is a Labour candidate a change from someone who is Labour in all but name? And, if he will not be held to ransom by the Labour Party, why is he standing as a Labour candidate? If MJ Carr was standing as an Independent, he would be the 'credible Independent candidate' that I feel middlesbrough needs. But he's standing as a Labour candidate. What gaurantee can we have that, once he's elected, he won't be a party patsy? And what of those that elect him as a Labour candidate? How will they view him if he doesn't act in the best interests of the party?
In the absence of a credible Independent candidate, I'm at a loss over who should get my vote.
Can you simply vote for your local councillor, and not vote at all in the mayoral aspect, or would that be regarded as a spoiled paper?
For me, this would be the only course of action right now. I still regard the removal of the Labour majority as the essential requisite for Middlesbrough to move forward, the mayoral role is secondary to this. So, at this point in time, three days before the polls are open, I really dont have a candidate to vote for as mayor.
Meanwhile, MJ Carr, the 'Labour' candidate who we are told, wouldn't toe the party line. So, conversely, he's Labour in name only. I've read his latest election flyer and I agree with much of what he says. My only gripe is with him saying 'Vote MJ Carr for Change'. How is a Labour candidate a change from someone who is Labour in all but name? And, if he will not be held to ransom by the Labour Party, why is he standing as a Labour candidate? If MJ Carr was standing as an Independent, he would be the 'credible Independent candidate' that I feel middlesbrough needs. But he's standing as a Labour candidate. What gaurantee can we have that, once he's elected, he won't be a party patsy? And what of those that elect him as a Labour candidate? How will they view him if he doesn't act in the best interests of the party?
In the absence of a credible Independent candidate, I'm at a loss over who should get my vote.
Can you simply vote for your local councillor, and not vote at all in the mayoral aspect, or would that be regarded as a spoiled paper?
For me, this would be the only course of action right now. I still regard the removal of the Labour majority as the essential requisite for Middlesbrough to move forward, the mayoral role is secondary to this. So, at this point in time, three days before the polls are open, I really dont have a candidate to vote for as mayor.