Middlesbrough Council - News Forum - Setting a light to the News

daveb of the EG
by BoroBot » Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:13 pm
Intrepid daveb
Productive Labour supporter
energetic loyal worker
guardian of Public Transport users
saviour of the imprisoned masses
or
liar?

Real moderators? Like Borobot you mean? The guy who starts threads with the sole intention of attacking members of a dead forum. Yeah, some moderator. Impartial to the last. I'm sure he wouldn't take sides should any of the EG crowd decide to give this place a whirl.

Explain to me the point of this post if it isn't just a pop at a poster on another site. It's in regard to a thread posted on the EG site, so why discuss it here? Is the guy in question a member of this site? Why initiate an obviously sarcastic thread about him? If there's a desire amongst the admin of this site to make this forum appear fair and unbiased I would suggest that this particular moderator strives for a higher standard. You can, of course, suggest that ,if I don't like how things are done here, I know where the door is. I can live with that.

It seems to me that you people went on to a site and were unable to stand your ground in any debate. Instead you chose to accuse. You accused those who disagreed with your views of working from a script. Without any shred of evidence you accused them of trying to infect other members' PCs with trojans. All these accusations and conspiracy theories invented by a man seething with anger at the personal position he finds himself in and ready to blame anyone who disagrees with his increasingly bizarre view of the world. Ready to blame anyone but himself.

As for attempting to post links to sites with trojans, as we are yet to see any evidence or proof of this, it remains a mere opinion. An opinion I do not subscribe to.

It only defeats my argument when you show your evidence. Until you do, it remains my opinion that this is just a certain posters' paranoid fantasy.

your argument fails:- stand back - look at this Forum - see what is happening

Just stating that my agument fails and posting a link to the index page isn't really my idea of debate. Why not get to the point instead of trying to be cryptic?