Page 1 of 1
Re: PROPOSED COUNCIL CUTS.
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:22 am
by chamber
The current deputy mayor is councillor David Budd. I wonder if he is happy to see the former d.mayor Bob Brady could be elected this May - will Buddy Boy still retain this high position (salary of around 19k)
?
Re: PROPOSED COUNCIL CUTS.
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 3:44 pm
by Bowen2010
Do you expct Mallon to have Brady back as deputy mayor then? Brady would not entertain standing in the ward in which he lives nor the ward he was beaten in in 2007 - no prizes fo guessing why.
Re: PROPOSED COUNCIL CUTS.
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:54 pm
by AHSOT1
Hi Bowen2010,
As there is no prizes... 'm not guessing, I'll awit the factual information arriving in my e mail inbox, Though I'm not saying which one.
Tosha
Re: PROPOSED COUNCIL CUTS.
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:06 pm
by Thomas D
I suspect Mallon and his Labour cabinet will make cuts which will effect people badly and then blame the government. It is up to them where they make the cuts - nobody else. One place I doubt wie will see any savings though is the extra allowances certain councllors claim. They would have to be voluntary.
Re: PROPOSED COUNCIL CUTS.
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:24 pm
by romulus
these are proposed cuts to services. Is there a procedure in place that allows the public to comment on them and suggest changes?
Is it still COs report to council executve with suggestions and recomendations then the big rubber stamp before the coucillors (the ones under the whip)get their prompt sheet to tell them how to vote when it goes before the council for approval/
Re: PROPOSED COUNCIL CUTS.
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:57 am
by alexander
Romulus - there was an article in the paper a while back telling us to contact Councillor Nicky Walker (the Labour executive for finance etc) if we had any ideas and suggestions for saving money, cuts etc. What is a CO please?
Re: PROPOSED COUNCIL CUTS.
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 9:22 pm
by romulus
alexander
C.o. = Chief Officer, Head of department or whatever their title is these days. The silent ones who realy run the show.
Re: PROPOSED COUNCIL CUTS.
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:46 pm
by alexander
Will the councillors be claiming less extras Iwonder.
Re: PROPOSED COUNCIL CUTS.
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:38 am
by BoroBot
HOW much does it cost to change a lightbulb? Well, it seems more than £1,000 for one North council.
That’s the amount dim bosses at the cash-strapped local authority forked out for an art expert to jet into the region twice – to help put up then take down this string of lights at a modern art show.
Middlesbrough Council – which made £6.8m in cuts and savings earlier this year – paid £532 for an “art courier” to spend one day and night on Teesside last March to help install the Felix Gonzalez-Torres show at the town’s mima gallery – and £142 of that was for “refreshments”.
The same expert returned four months later, at the end of mima’s A Certain Distance, Endless Light exhibition, “to oversee condition checking and de-installing” of a piece of art called Untitled – a string of dozens of lightbulbs suspended from the ceiling.
That two-day trip cost the public purse £529.80, meaning £1,060 was spent on the courier’s two trips.
And just seven months later Middlesbrough Council announced plans to make £52,700 of savings by slashing working hours at the Central Square-based gallery.
Charlotte Linacre, Campaign Manager at the TaxPayers’ Alliance said: “It’s increasingly difficult for local authorities to plead poverty with a straight face when they’re prepared to spend so frivolously.”
Mike Hill, regional organiser for UNISON, added: “’UNISON has consistently asked employers to review all unnecessary expenditure and waste in order to achieve efficiency savings and off set job losses and reductions in Terms and Conditions of service. This includes the use of expensive consultants, external contractors and unnecessary travel costs both within and outside the UK. In some areas we are winning the argument, but it is clear that in others the employer needs to look a little closer to home.”
The bill forms part of a whopping £316,919 spent in two years by North councils on overseas trips in which council executives have journeyed all over the globe for conferences and meetings. The Sunday Sun acquired details of all trips paid for by 11 North authorities in 2009 and 2010, using the Freedom of Information Act.
As well as spending £1,060 on flights, hotel stays and refreshments for the art courier, Middlesbrough spent £342.96 on a flight home to Prague for a “service user”.
And artistic forays abroad accounted for £7,158 of the £23,494 spent on overseas travel by Middlesbrough – 30% of the whole amount.
That includes £3,144.82 on a nine-day trip to New York for two officers for ‘acquisition and collection development’, and a further £400 on sending an officer to Dublin “to make relationships with Dublin based galleries”.
http://www.sundaysun.co.uk/news/north-e ... -28739445/
https://www.taxpayersalliance.com/media/2011/05/22