Middlesbrough Labour Party Cllr's

[BoroBot]

Middlesbrough Labour Party Members and/or supporters are alleged to be making derogatory remarks about other posters on local forums these posts are made in the guise of anon user names is it time to name and shame them?

Middlesbrough Town Hall computer and web facilities are paid from the public purse therefore this action is undertaken in the public interest

The attached files are Members only access from this forums website statistics
Other such records may be shown later

The following is from the Evening Gazette Forum
Re: Beechwood Mary
by genuinetroll »
I have an answer to that, get the EG to block all the ISP addresses pf councillors , if this stops councillors masquerading as Joe public on here making obnoxious comments to us, the people that elect them then i am all for it.
If they wish to make comments then let them do it from a central computer in the town hall, a sort of pay as you go ,logging all the threads, time spent online etc...I bet this would reduce the amount of time councillors spend online stalking and haranguing joe bloggs. Yeah Yeah before anyone wets their pants, yeah yeah it wont happen especially not if they have their busy bees doing such tasks for them.

BTW do they get any financial assistance for Internet use etc.

http://forums.gazettelive.co.uk/viewtop ... c0#p220141

Re: Beechwood Mary
by genuinetroll »
Greshamresident wrote:All of you who are criticising councillors yet remain anonymous, could well be councillors also. A bit of fun at your own expense is a good way to deflect others from your identity and role.

Incidentally, Beechwoodmary would be daft to present any evidence to you lot. Most of you are a bunch of dark room keyboard warriors with nothing to offer other than your own tepid views. People of no importance outside the confines of your gigantic egos. JohnR excepted.

Hi GR, to be fair as you and BWM dont preach hate or have any hidden right wing agenda I have no prob with that at all. With regards to my tongue in cheek comments about internet use by councillors, well its simply aimed at any councillor who use these means to hound and berate members of the public. I seem to recall one councillor (name we cant mention in case the drones get all worked up , but remember standards board about the councillors behaviour towards a member of the Joe bloggs public online.. and has been identified using another ID since then!! Well its low down dirty stuff like that , that would be stopped if it was nipped in the bud at source.

I know I waffle but what I am saying is that if councillors - those who are elected by the tax payer, well if these councillors want to spend time idling away on numerous forums, websites and such , under numerous guises, causing mischief with their drones, disciples and such, showing traits of a stalker etc etc, well if they have the time to do all this .., when do they do the work they are PAID to do? Yeah it could be argued that they are not councillors 24/7 and should be able to have their say as a resident, but if someone wants to elevate themselves to the dizzy heights of local politician then they should expect their actions to be scrutinised whenever. ( no matter which flag they fly)

just my opinion.

BTW I am certainly no councillor, dont work for the council, I am anon to some, not so much a no mark, more of a man in the street/face in the crowd, certainly not a keyboard warrior, but the dark room, well that depends if I have a headache coming on.

PS dont rise to the bait for Norris and uncle Albert to peck away like birds rummaging for seed.

(know dowt the online self appoynted spellin' & sintax squod will peck away at mee pursting)

http://forums.gazettelive.co.uk/viewtop ... c0#p220205

Re: Beechwood Mary
by daveb »
Greshamresident wrote:Incidentally, Beechwoodmary would be daft to present any evidence to you lot. Most of you are a bunch of dark room keyboard warriors with nothing to offer other than your own tepid views. People of no importance outside the confines of your gigantic egos. JohnR excepted.

i take great exception to this slur on EVERYBODY but JohnR.

Robbo and Anth seem ok too.

http://forums.gazettelive.co.uk/viewtop ... 37#p220218

[BoroBot]

Members Only Files
Local Authority IP details from web server statistics

THESE ARE NOT FORUM MEMBER IP DETAILS

[AHSOT1]

Hi Cockburn,

Where is this one?

81.108.107.130


81.108.107.130 located in United Kingdom





my ip IP Tracing and IP Tracking (81.108.107.130)
Want to trace or track an IP Address, host or website easily?

With our highly reliable IP Address Location Database, you can get detailed information on any IP Address anywhere in the world.

Results Include: Detailed IP Address Location, Name Of ISP, Netspeed/ Speed Of Internet Connection And Lots More.

Enter The IP Address/Host Or Website Below To Get Detailed And Accurate Information:

Examples: 213.86.83.116 (IP address) or google.com (Website)
Tracing 81.108.107.130. please wait
81.108.107.130 IP address location & more:
IP address [?]: 81.108.107.130 [Whois] [Reverse IP]
IP country code: GB
IP address country: ip address flag United Kingdom
IP address state: Middlesbrough
IP address city: Middlesbrough
IP address latitude: 54.5728
IP address longitude: -1.1628
ISP of this IP [?]: Virgin Media
Organization: Middlesborough Council
Host of this IP: [?]: 130-107-108-81.static.virginmedia.com [Whois] [Trace]
Local time in United Kingdom: 2011-05-18 15:23


81.108.107.130 located in United Kingdom

IP address: 81.108.107.130
IP country: United Kingdom
IP Address state: Middlesbrough
IP Address city: Middlesbrough
IP latitude: 54.5728
IP longitude: -1.1628
ISP: Virgin Media
Organization: Middlesborough Council
Host: 130-107-108-81.static.virginmedia.com

Tosha

[Anth2010]

C:\Users\Anth>tracert 81.108.107.130

Tracing route to 130-107-108-81.static.virginmedia.com [81.108.107.130]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.2.1
2 6 ms 7 ms 30 ms 10.133.116.1
3 6 ms 18 ms 9 ms midd-cam-1a-v120.network.virginmedia.net [213.106.238.97]
4 29 ms 6 ms 26 ms midd-core-1a-ae1-0.network.virginmedia.net [195.182.176.97]
5 12 ms 54 ms 38 ms leed-bb-1a-as7-0.network.virginmedia.net [213.105.75.45]
6 15 ms 65 ms 16 ms manc-bb-1b-as3-0.network.virginmedia.net [213.105.175.142]
7 16 ms 14 ms 15 ms manc-core-1b-as0-0.network.virginmedia.net [212.43.163.65]
8 15 ms 17 ms 16 ms manc-lam-4-tenge21.network.virginmedia.net [213.104.242.154]
9 23 ms 23 ms 24 ms host82-15-205-241.not-set-yet.ntli.net [82.15.205.241]
10 * *
It tells me I am hitting a router/firewall at 82.15.205.241 thats setup to not repsond to ping.
Whats interesting is where it bounces around to when its resolved the hostname.

Still it means frigg all really. All it tells us is that 81.108.107.130 resides somewhere within NTL, which I could have told you because its very similar to all NTL IP addresses.

[BoroBot]

NetRange: 82.0.0.0 - 82.255.255.255
CIDR: 82.0.0.0/8
OriginAS:
NetName: 82-RIPE
NetHandle: NET-82-0-0-0-1
Parent:
NetType: Allocated to RIPE NCC
Comment: These addresses have been further assigned to users in
Comment: the RIPE NCC region. Contact information can be found in
Comment: the RIPE database at http://www.ripe.net/whois
RegDate: 2002-11-23
Updated: 2004-03-16
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-82-0-0-0-1

OrgName: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
OrgId: RIPE
Address: P.O. Box 10096
City: Amsterdam
StateProv:
PostalCode: 1001EB
Country: NL
RegDate:
Updated: 2011-03-15
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/RIPE

ReferralServer: whois://whois.ripe.net:43

OrgTechHandle: RNO29-ARIN
OrgTechName: RIPE NCC Operations
OrgTechPhone: +31 20 535 4444
OrgTechEmail: do_not_email@ripe.invalid
OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/RNO29-ARIN