People’s Republic of Teesside

Cllr Steve Bloundelle, as chairman of Middlesbrough Council, spoke out against the ‘internet bloggers, the critics, the letter-writers to the Gazette, who he claims fuel the flames of the arsonist that torched the vehicles of two Labour councillors. In a blatant attack on the freedom of speech and on democracy, he insisted that the full force of the ‘Law’ should be brought down on such people. Dated: June 20th 2012.
Post Reply
User avatar
Spanish-Inquisition
Site Admin
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 8:34 am

People’s Republic of Teesside

Post by Spanish-Inquisition »

Another terrorist website? - From Citizen Walsh: Barry Coppinger cohort

“be afraid, be very afraid” Mayor of Middlesbrough Ray Mallon “My message to them is - Be afraid, be very afraid.”

Mr Mallon added said politics was about influencing and persuading one another, a complex interaction of many people across the town from all walks of life. “There will always be some agreement and disagreement but, when major decisions are taken, the democratic voting rights of elected representatives will prevail,” he added. He referred to “so-called community-type activists” who had been scathing about many councillors in the Council Chamber. “Such individuals had personal agendas towards some of you, both individually and collectively,” he added. “Many of these people could only criticise and could not articulate viable alternatives. “It appeared to me they did not want change in so far as the town was concerned.”
There was, as yet, no one single socialist or republican party. Instead there were a plethora of small groups in both London and the provinces a sea within which often the same individuals acted and argued. One group however could be seen as bearing the seeds of the future - the International Working Men's Association (IWMA). The IWMA was founded by an alliance between Karl Marx and a number of British radial Trade Union leaders, and lived up to its title by setting up alliances with overseas radical movements.

At home, the IWMA established a network of local groups and one area with a high degree of organisation was on Teesside. Here, it drew on the radicalism of the Cleveland miners in areas like Eston and East Cleveland, an informal network of advanced radicals in Middlesbrough and the Fenian current that dominated the large Irish community working in Teesside's iron and steel industry. Teesside's importance was such that it provided some of the leadership cadres of the IWMA in Great Britain and was also a centre of radical publishing.

The Advocate and Record, by contrast, is a more fascinating read. It was 'ours' too - published and printed in Middlesbrough. Given this geographical proximity, it gives much information on the issues affecting the Cleveland Ironstone Miners and their Union - the Cleveland Miners and Qarreymen's Association. Outwith of Cleveland it also covered, in great detail, detailed news from mining areas across Great Britain - from the Forest of Dean and Cornwall to Scotland - and obviously had a deep network of correspondents from these regions.

It was militantly republican, often devoting whole pages to royal excesses, and was solidly for the extension of the suffrage and for the need for working men to fight to obtain public office at town halls and in Westminster. It was also fiercely iconoclastic and did not defer to the leaders of;labour where it felt they were failing their people (the Secretary of the Cleveland Miners Association, the liberal and devout Methodist, Joseph Sheppard once described it as a 'puerile little paper', something which the paper highlighted gleefully).

It is clear by the reciprocal swapping of articles and intelligence between the IWMA and the 'International Herald' that the 'Miners Advocate and Record', and its publisher, John Gould, based at an office and print plant in Middlesbrough's South Street, that there was a commonality of interests and an organisational overlay, an overlay shown by the fact that many of those quoted in the 'Advocate and Record' also show up in the 'International Herald's' reports of Teesside activity. It is clear that local Cleveland groups were up and running. On some occasions they were identified as being sections of the International, and at some times as 'republican clubs'. It seems both terms were mutually interchangeable.

Let us firstly turn to the International Herald and their local reports. (in italics)

They begin in mid April 1872 where it is reported by the Leader of the Middlesbrough IWMA,
Citizen Whalley informs us that an Irish branch of the IWMA has been formed at Middlesboro, and a new branch is shortly to be started in Stockton; good activity of Sunderland branch

Later that month a report of a meeting of the Middlesbrough IWMA gave us the names of some of our forbears "Middlesborough Branch of the IWMA. Scott in chair; Whalley, Quigley, Scott, Finegan, Matthews address meeting; rapid growth of branch; reported by R. Matthews, Correpondence Secretary"

In the same issue we come across a name of someone living at 19 Vaughan Street, Middlesbrough, who was to be one of the national leaders of the IWMA This was the fascinating John de Morgan. De Morgan was an Ulsterman and a dedicated republican, founding the IWMA in Ireland and running for a period, its Cork Branch. He later became a constant and colourful presence in advanced radical circles in Late Victorian Britain and was, for a time, the National UK Secretary of the IWMA. He was later notorious for organising street violence to prevent enclosure of common lands in the London suburbs for new housing and later ended his days in the US where he became a leading light in many radical and populist political movements, More on De Morgan and his life can be found in the Victorian Footnotes website on http://victorianfootnotes.net/2011/05/0 ... de-morgan/

Later in that year the alliance with John Kane, the national leader of the Ironmoulders Union was obviously beginning to bear fruit with a decision to widen links with local Trade Unions "Reports of Meetings) Middlesbrough Republican Club - decides to send deputations to the various trade societies "to press upon them the expediency of a united action upon their part, for the purpose of returning a working man representative, at the next general election for the Borough of Middlesbrough" (reported by W. G. Harrison, 88 Church Street, sec.)

Kane did, in fact, contest the 1874 General Election as 'a candidate of Labour' but lost heavily to the local Conservative Ironmaster, Henry Bolckow,
http://republic-of-teesside.blogspot.co.uk/
User avatar
Spanish-Inquisition
Site Admin
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 8:34 am

Re: People’s Republic of Teesside

Post by Spanish-Inquisition »

“be afraid, be very afraid” Mayor of Middlesbrough Ray Mallon “My message to them is - Be afraid, be very afraid.”

Mr Mallon added said politics was about influencing and persuading one another, a complex interaction of many people across the town from all walks of life. “There will always be some agreement and disagreement but, when major decisions are taken, the democratic voting rights of elected representatives will prevail,” he added. He referred to “so-called community-type activists” who had been scathing about many councillors in the Council Chamber. “Such individuals had personal agendas towards some of you, both individually and collectively,” he added. “Many of these people could only criticise and could not articulate viable alternatives. “It appeared to me they did not want change in so far as the town was concerned.”


Cllr Saj Khan - an exclusive interview for the PRT!
I also raise the record of Middlesbrough Council. Councillor Khan agreed with me that Ray Mallon has always taken a reactionary line on ‘law and order’ issues in that Middlesbrough Council has massively increased its surveillance operations, has placed hidden microphones around the town to shout at people dropping litter, and has plastered photographs of young people given ASBOs over the backs of buses.
I point out that most of this was done not only with the support of, but under the direct responsibility of Labour Councillors.
“This is something that’s true.”

Many people in the Labour Party, I suggest, seem to take a rather inverted snobbery approach to civil liberties issues. It’s regarded as distractionist; the sort of thing middle class liberals discuss at dinner parties. Labour politicians will always point out that their working class constituents actually favour CCTV and ASBOs and so on.

“Cleveland Police has always been politicised though. Particularly since Mallon and all the corruption during that time we now have Pryce and McLuckie under investigation. The whole Cleveland Police Authority needs changing.”
“Despite that, it would be near impossible for a Labour Commissioner to push through hard line socialist policies, as the individual police officers have to be politically neutral.”

“I don’t think I’ll be on the Labour shortlist as much as I’d like to be. I think the Party will decide at a national level that you have to be on the Police Committee in order to stand. Which is a problem because it’s many of the people who already sit on the Committee that are involved with the problems at the moment.”
TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2012
Cllr Saj Khan - an exclusive interview for the PRT!
posted by Joe at 11:27 AM
The Police Force has always been a highly politicised institution. From its creation under Home Secretary Robert Peel in the early 19th century to deal with middle class concerns about the Captain Swing riots, it was then gradually developed directly adjacent to the rise of violent Chartist agitation and early trade unionism.
In this century too, it has maintained its political status. The most obvious example of this occurred during the 1984/5 miners’ strike, but we have also seen the politics of the police at play during the G20 demonstrations in London in 2008 and more recently with the exposure of its close links with the Murdoch press.
Much of the left-wing debate on the police, however, concentrates too heavily on the Met. What are the politics of Cleveland Police?

I first met Middlesbrough Councillor Sajaad Khan last year, when we were both Labour candidates in May’s local elections. Unlike me he was successful and was elected in first place for the tough Gresham Ward, ousting former Council Leader Ken Walker in the process.
I was intrigued to read of his somewhat bold candidature for the Labour nomination for Cleveland Police Commissioner, with the first set of elections due to be held this November. At 31 he is still a young councillor and is decidedly un-embedded within Teesside’s civic society. If anything, despite being a Labour councillor, he’s something of an outsider within the local political world.
Personally I am sceptical towards the whole notion of elected Police Commissioners, but Khan’s campaign has already been the beneficiary of prominent featured articles in both the Evening Gazette and the Northern Echo, and as he may well be the first Cleveland Commissioner I was delighted that he agreed to be interviewed exclusively by the People’s Republic of Teesside so that I could try and understand a bit more about his intentions.

I didn’t even have to ask him a question at first. He had barely sat down when he immediately made clear to me his motivations:

“Basically, I’m not happy with the state of the police at the moment, and I can’t accept the rationale that a former Police Committee member, or a bureaucrat, can be the right person for the job, we need someone who brings a fresh perspective.”

“Police Committee members are conditioned to make decisions in a certain way which can be two dimensional. It needs a new voice. For Cleveland Police, it’s the management, the structure and the policing strategy that all needs changing. But they’re only now talking about stuff a Police Commissioner could do, that they could have been doing already!”

I raise with him my concerns that the whole concept of Police Commissioners is a bit of a populist, right-wing gimmick from a Tory Government. What is the point of it all?

“I’m tired of people playing the politics of fear. The boundary reviews, for example, are going to have a massive effect. Looking at Hartlepool, it’s going to go down from 47 to 33 Councillors. That will have a number of positive effects in that it will save public money and result in fewer bureaucrats, but the people who actually live in the Wards will still be there.”

“Neighbourhood policing is being rationed,” he continues, “We're losing many police officers, but they’re also being redeployed and rationed elsewhere. It’s true we’ve lost many 999 operators.”

Isn’t this a political move by the Tories, though? They will know that their political opponents’ resources are stretched, and that the more elections they invent the more those resources will be stretched?
“Yes.”

Also, don’t the Tories just want to pander to their reactionary base by having a few ‘hang em and flog em’ candidates win Commissioner roles at a local level, and that they can just wash their hands of it?
“That’s the scary thing. Hopefully it should be prevented as anyone who wants to stand will have to pay £5,000, and i'm unsure if there will be any refunds. Hopefully this will deter any EDL or BNP or other far-right nut-jobs from standing!”

“It is true though that if we end up with powerful Commissioners with no checks and balances they would be able to push through extremely harsh policies. In fact, if you look at the surveillance capabilities Middlesbrough Council and Cleveland Police has, a Police Commissioner could really do pretty much whatever they want.”
“David Cameron also knows that it will be a useful election issue in 2015, as he will be able to shift the blame for any rise in crime – caused by his economic policies – onto Labour Police Commissioners.”

I raise the record of the Blair Government with regards to Civil Liberties issues. Isn’t it the case that there were a lot of highly authoritarian policies that were pushed through: the increasing weaponisation of the police; increased powers of detention without charge, proposals for I.D Cards, increased powers of stop and search, and the widespread use of Control Orders and ASBOs?

I also raise the record of Middlesbrough Council. Councillor Khan agreed with me that Ray Mallon has always taken a reactionary line on ‘law and order’ issues in that Middlesbrough Council has massively increased its surveillance operations, has placed hidden microphones around the town to shout at people dropping litter, and has plastered photographs of young people given ASBOs over the backs of buses.
I point out that most of this was done not only with the support of, but under the direct responsibility of Labour Councillors.
“This is something that’s true.”

Many people in the Labour Party, I suggest, seem to take a rather inverted snobbery approach to civil liberties issues. It’s regarded as distractionist; the sort of thing middle class liberals discuss at dinner parties. Labour politicians will always point out that their working class constituents actually favour CCTV and ASBOs and so on.

“Well you’re a lawyer, and looking at it from a lawyer’s perspective, this is the worst thing that might now happen. The police will become politicised.”

“Cleveland Police has always been politicised though. Particularly since Mallon and all the corruption during that time we now have Pryce and McLuckie under investigation. The whole Cleveland Police Authority needs changing.”
“Despite that, it would be near impossible for a Labour Commissioner to push through hard line socialist policies, as the individual police officers have to be politically neutral.”

“The Police Commissioner will be a very highly paid post. It’ll be paid more than an MP, but you won’t have any Parliamentary Privileges. So who exactly will you be accountable to? In Cleveland you will be accountable to Labour Councillors and independent representation, you could say the old school club. I’d like to see panellists without allowances, and the money saved should go back into the force, back into services. You should also have members of the public on the panel.”

“Actually, that would be something you’d be good at!”
“Not if it would be unpaid, it wouldn’t!”

Finally, I suggest that there are two obvious outstanding questions. I mention that when I was a candidate last year I was aged only 22, and that if I was correct in my thinking if I had been elected that would have made me the second youngest Councillor in Middlesbrough’s history – behind Steve Gibson. I observed that I was frequently advised to make political capital out of being a ‘young’ candidate but that I was always reluctant to do so as I couldn’t see what justification I might have to portray myself as a representative of the youth of Middlesbrough, and that in fact I don’t think I am. I ask him, however, whether he would stand not just as the ‘young’ candidate, but as an ‘Asian’ candidate.
“Yes, definitely.”

I ask him for his interpretation of the relationship between the police and the Asian community on Teesside.
“You have to remember that there are now over 30,000 Black and Muslim people living on Teesside, not to mention Kurds, Africans, Hindus, Sikhs and so on, and the relationship with the police needs to be better.”
“We have issues on Teesside with extremism and forced marriage, but we also have issues with alienation and exclusion.”
Is this something your election might address?
“Yes. I genuinely believe we need a candidate who can unite everybody under one banner. I think I’m that candidate. The Tories are hopeless when it comes to this. Did you know they had to put out a booklet to activists and candidates with guidance for how to ‘connect’ with Black voters?”
No! But then it hardly surprises me at all!
“I really think that the Labour Party is the only mainstream party that ‘gets’ this issue and wants to do something about it.”

Our chat then came to a close. I asked him what he thought his chances were.
“I don’t think I’ll be on the Labour shortlist as much as I’d like to be. I think the Party will decide at a national level that you have to be on the Police Committee in order to stand. Which is a problem because it’s many of the people who already sit on the Committee that are involved with the problems at the moment.”

So if you were able to be shortlisted it would really shake things up?
“That’s my intention, but as I say I don’t think it’ll happen.”
http://republic-of-teesside.blogspot.co ... e+election
User avatar
Spanish-Inquisition
Site Admin
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 8:34 am

Re: People’s Republic of Teesside

Post by Spanish-Inquisition »

“be afraid, be very afraid” Mayor of Middlesbrough Ray Mallon “My message to them is - Be afraid, be very afraid.”

Mr Mallon added said politics was about influencing and persuading one another, a complex interaction of many people across the town from all walks of life. “There will always be some agreement and disagreement but, when major decisions are taken, the democratic voting rights of elected representatives will prevail,” he added. He referred to “so-called community-type activists” who had been scathing about many councillors in the Council Chamber. “Such individuals had personal agendas towards some of you, both individually and collectively,” he added. “Many of these people could only criticise and could not articulate viable alternatives. “It appeared to me they did not want change in so far as the town was concerned.”
Reclaiming History: an interview with Craig Hornby
posted by D.B. at 12:01 AM

As the development of Middlesbrough continues, Teesside's revolutionary fanzine The Sound of the Modern Lonely caught up with radical Teesside film-maker Craig Hornby, the man behind 2004’s epic docu-film A Century In Stone, to chat about Eston miners and Ray Mallon’s “designer label town”.
http://republic-of-teesside.blogspot.co ... craig.html
Post Reply